Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Paul LaPosta's avatar

“Enshittification squeezes down, ensloppification pushes up” is the cleanest description I have seen of why everything starts to feel like the same ghostwriter with the same six templates. AI is not the root cause. It just removed the last remaining constraint: effort. Spot on.

One important nuance though: ensloppification by itself is not automatically bad. It is a forcing function.

When artifacts get cheap and plausible, production stops being the hard part. The hard part becomes discernment: knowing what to trust, what to keep, what to ship, and who will own the consequences.

The part that is bad is the legibility collapse that follows when incentives reward artifact volume over owned judgment. Provenance disappears. Intent disappears. The internet gets louder while getting less accountable.

What decides which path we get is incentives and interface. Slop can push people toward sharper standards, or toward resignation. The failure mode is newstainment: tired people stop checking, vibes get treated as truth, and the epistemic floor drops.

My countermeasure is boring and unfashionable: standards. Not purity tests. Standards that force traceable thought.

No scope, no claim. State premises. Show method. Provide evidence. Name tradeoffs. Include a disproof check.

If slop is the flood, discernment has to become the boat.

Artifacts are cheap. Judgment is scarce.

Kaisa Martiskainen's avatar

Thank you for this! I’ve had this creepy feeling for the past 5 years about all things online and finally I can call it what it is: ensloppification

22 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?